Pathology of Rural Production Cooperatives – Evidence from Iran
Abstract
Cooperative rural production companies are one of the most important types of cooperative system in Iran. Its activities have been started since 1963. It seems that this farming system hasn’t been able to become a source of positive developments to date. The present study seeks to assess the pathology of rural production cooperatives. The statistical population of this research is 55 rural cooperatives of Isfahan province with 21213 members that 41 cooperatives are active, with 16,870 members. The data collection method was documentary and survey. The required information for this research was collected by using a library method as well as interviewing method and completing the questionnaire. The sampling method was randomly classified according to the number of members of each cooperative based on sample size. According to the Cochran formula, 217 samples were determined and questionnaires were completed by the members. Also, 98 questionnaires were completed by the managers and board of cooperative production companies. The results showed that at least seven categories of damaged can be listed for these cooperatives, which are: adverse characteristics in cooperative members, adverse characteristics in cooperatives management, lack of communication, trust and participation of members with the management of cooperatives, low social activity of members in cooperatives, lack of effectiveness training for cooperative members, dissatisfaction with cooperative performance and lack of social capital.
Received: 22 December 2021
Accepted: 28 October 2022
Downloads
References
ABEBAW, D and HAILE, M. G. 2013. The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy 38(1): 82-91. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919212001030
ALSTON, J. M., and PARDEY, P. G. 2014. Agriculture in the global economy. J. Eco. Perspect. 28(1): 121-146.
ARAYESH, M.B. 2017. The Relationship between Extension Educational and Psychological Factors and Participation of Agricultural Cooperatives’ Members (Case of Shirvan Chardavol County, Ilam, Iran). International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), 7(1):79-87.
AREF, F. 2011. Agricultural Cooperatives for Agricultural Development in Iran. Life Science Journal. 8: 82-85.
BIGLERI, N., Medicine Rad, Gh. 2013. And when you thought, n.º Strategies for Empowering Production Cooperatives from the Perspective of National and Provincial Experts, Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran 1 (44): 113-103.
BOUDLAIE, H., BOGHOSIAN, A and PANJALI, H.M. 2018. The impact of corporate social responsibility and internal marketing on employee turnover intentions with the mediating role of organizational commitment, 15(4): 29-44.
BRISCOE, T. 2010. Making worker cooperatives effective in South Pacific. J. Pacific. Stud. 16: 243-248.
CELIK, A., METIN, I. and CELIK, M. 2012. Taking a photo of Turkish fishery sector: a swot analysis. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 58: 1515-1524.
CENTRAL ORGANIZATION OF RURAL COOPERATIVES OF IRAN. 2019. Systems of formation and establishment of cooperatives of rural production, agricultural joint stock, agriculture and industry in the agricultural sector (first edition), Asrar Alam Publications, Tehran.
DELGADO, C. 2007. Agro industrialization through institutional innovation: Transaction Costs, Co-operatives and Milk-Market Development in the Ethiopian highlands. Int. Food Policy Res. 1:101-110.
DERR, J. B. 2013. The Co-operative movement of Brazil and South Africa. Sustainable Development, 1, 1-14.
EBRAHIMI, Mohammad Sadegh, and MOJTABA GHAEDIYAN. 2021. “Corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment in agricultural cooperatives: evidence from Iran”. International Association of Cooperative Law Journal, no. 59 (December), 263-83. https://doi.org/10.18543/baidc-59-2021pp263-283.
EFTEKHARI, A., PORTAHERI, M., FARAJZADEH, M. and lawyer HEYDARI, S. 2009. The Role of Empowerment in Agricultural Development, Case Study: Ardabil Province, Human Geography Research 69: 103-87.
FARYABI, M., AHMADVAND, M. 2017. The Determinants of Rural Production Cooperatives’ Performance in South of Kerman Province. Journal of Rural Research, 8(3), 404-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22059/jrur.2017.63474.
GARNEVSKAA, E., LIUB, G. and SHADBOLT, N. M. 2011. Factors for successful development of farmer cooperatives in northwest china. International Food and Agribusiness Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 69-84.
GOLLIN, D. 2010. Agricultural productivity and economic growth, handbook of agricultural economics 4: 3825-3866.
GULEN, O. 2013. Women’s cooperatives in Turkey. Procedia Soc. Behar. Sci. 81: 300-305. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813014997
GRASHUS, J and SU, Y. 2018. A review of the empirical literature on farmer cooperatives: performance, ownership and governance, finance and member attitude. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 12(4): 77-102.
HEIDARI, F., NADERI MEHDI, K., YAGHOUBI FARANI, A. and HEYDARI, A. 2015. Identification indicators of successful agricultural cooperatives, Quarterly Journal of Cooperatives and Agriculture 4 (14): 60-39.
ICA. 2016. SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING FOR CO-OPERATIVES: A GUIDEBOOK, International Cooperative Alliance, March, p. 32.
KALANTARI, Khalil. 2018. Data processing and analysis in economic and social research. Sharif Publications.
KHOSRAVIPOUR, B. and AHMADI, M. 2017. Rural Production Cooperatives (Challenges and Strategies). Management and Entrepreneurship Studies, 3(4-1): 69-82.
MOHAMMED, N. and LEE, B. W. 2015. Role of cooperatives in rural development, the case of south nation’s nationalities and people region, Ethiopia. Sci .J. Bus. Manage 3(4): 102-108.
NAJAFI, M., NORI, H and AMINI, A. 2019. Assessing the Role of Management in Performance of Rural Production Cooperatives: (A Case Study of Isfahan Province). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 50(3): 531-547.
NEKOUEI NAIENI, S., GHANBARI, Y., BARGHI, H. 2019. Assessing the Stability of Farming System in Rural Production Cooperatives in Isfahan Province and the Effective Strategies to Achieve it. Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 8(1), 111-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/jrrp.v8i1.72976
NORUZI, M. R and WESTOVER, J. H. 2010. Opportunities, Challenges and Employment Relative Advantages in the Cooperative Sector in Iran. Management Science and Engineering, 4(3): 10-18.
SADIGHI, H and DARVISHINIA, H. 2005. Farmers’ Professional Satisfaction with the Rural Production Cooperative Approach. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 7: 1-8.
SARMAD, Z., AS, BAZARGAN. and A., HEJAZI. 2017. Research methods in behavioral sciences. Agah Publications.
SIEGAL, G. 2010. Toward a model rural development quarterly. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 5(12):106-117.
VINK, N. 2012. The long-term economic consequences of agricultural marketing legislation in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 80(4), 553-566
WORLD CO-OPERATIVE MONITOR. 2017. Exploring the Co-operative economy, Eurisce-ICA.
WOSSEN, T., T. ABDOULAYE, A. ALENE, M. HAILE, S. FELEKE, A. OLANREWAJU and MANYONG, T. 2017. Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. J. Rural Stud. 54: 223-233. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016716302790
ZARE SHAHABADI, A., HAJIZADEH MEYMANDI, M. And MOBILE KHALAJ, H. 2015. Socio-Cultural Factors Related to the Success of Production Cooperatives in Yazd, Social Development Quarterly 10 (1): 156-127.
The authors, by submitting their manuscripts to the International Association of Cooperative Law Journal, accept the conditions listed below on copyright and undertake to comply with them.
1. Assignment of rights
The Publisher (University of Deusto) retains the copyright for this publication.
The authors, by submitting their manuscripts to the International Association of Cooperative Law Journal (BAIDC), without signing any document of assignment, grant to the Publisher (University of Deusto), royalty-free, the distribution, public communication, and reproduction rights of their work subject of publication in the International Association of Cooperative Law Journal (BAIDC), whichever the media may be, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes including the permission to include it in the databases where this Journal is indexed.
2. Authorship
The authors must be the sole creators of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the co-authors.
Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind have been granted or will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher (University of Deusto).
The authors assume the responsibility for obtaining all the necessary licences for the reproduction in their manuscripts of any text, material or illustration coming from another author, institution or publication.
3. Copyright and Code of conduct
Authors warrant that their work is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate the Ethical Guidelines of the BAIDC and any codes (of conduct), laws or any rights of any third party.
4. Dissemination under Open Access regime
Upon its publication, the content of any Issue of International Association of Cooperative Law Journal (BAIDC), can be accessed, read, downloaded, copied, and distributed freely for non-commercial purposes, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author; provided the original work is properly cited and any changes to the original are clearly indicated.
5. Reuse of the article by the authors
Authors retain the right to present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their work, as long as they clearly indicate in the first footnote that the work was published in International Association of Cooperative Law Journal (BAIDC), for the first time, indicating the Issue number, year, pages, and DOI (if applicable).
Legal notice
Any use of the content of the paper against the rules set above in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.
The liabilities that may arise from complaints for publishing plagiarised articles are the sole responsibility of the authors.